Trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (DESTINY-Lung01): primary results of the HER2-overexpressing cohorts from a single-arm, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: DESTINY-Lung01 is a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study evaluating the antitumour activity and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan, a HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with HER2-overexpressing or HER2 (ERBB2)-mutant unresectable or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The results of the HER2-mutant cohort (cohort 2) have been reported elsewhere. Herein, we report the primary analysis of cohorts 1 and 1A, which aimed to evaluate the activity and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan 5·4 mg/kg and 6·4 mg/kg in patients with HER2-overexpressing NSCLC. METHODS: Patients aged 18 years or older with unresectable or metastatic (or both unresectable and metastatic) non-squamous NSCLC who had relapsed following or were refractory to standard treatment or for whom no standard treatment was available, with an HER2 immunohistochemistry score of 3+ or 2+ (without known HER2 mutations) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1, were enrolled at 20 specialist hospitals in France, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain, and the USA. Patients were assigned to cohorts sequentially, first to cohort 1, to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan 6·4 mg/kg (cohort 1), then to cohort 1A, to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan 5·4 mg/kg, both administered intravenously once every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate by independent central review and was assessed in the full analysis set, which included all patients who signed an informed consent form and were enrolled in the study. Safety was assessed in all enrolled patients who received at least one dose of trastuzumab deruxtecan. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03505710, and is ongoing (closed to recruitment). FINDINGS: Between Aug 27, 2018, and Jan 28, 2020, 49 patients were enrolled in cohort 1 (median age 63·0 years [IQR 58·0-68·0], 30 [61%] male, 19 [39%] female, and 31 [63%] White), and from June 16 to Dec 9, 2020, 41 patients were enrolled in cohort 1A (median age 62·0 years [IQR 56·0-66·0], 22 [54%] male, 19 [46%] female, and 31 [76%] White). As of data cutoff (Dec 3, 2021), the median treatment duration was 4·1 months (IQR 1·4-7·1) in cohort 1 and 5·5 months (1·4-8·7) in cohort 1A, and median follow-up was 12·0 months (5·4-22·4) in cohort 1 and 10·6 months (4·5-13·5) in cohort 1A. Confirmed objective response rate by independent central review was 26·5% (95% CI 15·0-41·1; 13 of 49, all partial responses) in cohort 1 and 34·1% (20·1-50·6; 14 of 41; two complete responses and 12 partial responses) in cohort 1A. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neutropenia (12 [24%] of 49 in cohort 1, none in cohort 1A), pneumonia (six [12%] and two [5%], respectively), fatigue (six [12%] and three [7%], respectively), and disease progression (six [12%] and four [10%], respectively). Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 26 (53%) of 41 patients in cohort 1 and nine (22%) of 49 patients in cohort 1A. Drug-related serious adverse events were reported in ten (20%) patients and three (7%) patients, respectively. Deaths due to treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in ten (20%) patients in cohort 1 (disease progression in six (12%) patients and bronchospasm, hydrocephalus, respiratory failure, and pneumonitis in one [2%] patient each), and in seven (17%) patients in cohort 1A (due to disease progression in four (10%) patients and dyspnoea, malignant neoplasm, and sepsis in one (2%) patient each). One death due to a treatment-emergent adverse event was determined to be due to study treatment by the investigator, which was in cohort 1 (pneumonitis). Independent adjudication of interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis found that drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis occurred in ten (20%) patients in cohort 1 (two [4%] grade 1, five [10%] grade 2, and three [6%] grade 5) and two (5%) patients in cohort 1A (one [2%] grade 2 and one [2%] grade 5). An additional patient in cohort 1A had grade 4 pneumonitis after the data cutoff, which was subsequently adjudicated as drug-related grade 5 interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis. INTERPRETATION: Given the low antitumour activity of existing treatment options in this patient population, trastuzumab deruxtecan might have the potential to fill a large unmet need in HER2-overexpressing NSCLC. Our findings support further investigation of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-overexpressing NSCLC. FUNDING: Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca.

Prognostic implications of HER2NEU-low in metastatic breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: We explored characteristics and clinical outcomes of HER2-negative and HER2-low metastatic breast cancers using real-world data. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database to identify MBC patients that were HER2-low or HER2-negative per immunohistochemical staining. A binomial regression analysis identified demographic and clinical correlates of each subtype. A Cox multivariable regression analysis (MVA) and propensity-match analysis were performed to identify correlates of survival. RESULTS: Excluding missing data, 24,636 MBC patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2015 were identified; 27.9% were HER2-negative and 72.1% were HER2-low. There were no relevant demographic differences between the groups. HER2-low tumors were half as likely to have concomitant hormone receptor-positive status (p < 0.01). The 3-year survival rate among hormone receptor-negative patients was 33.8% for HER2-low and 32.2% for HER2-negative (p < 0.05), and 60.9% and 55.6% in HER2-low and HER2-negative cases among hormone receptor-positive patients (p < 0.05), respectively. HER2-low cases were associated with better survival on MVA (HR =0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99) and remained superior with propensity-matching (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.89-0.96). In a subset analysis isolated to hormone receptor-positive cases, HER2-low remained correlated with improved survival (HR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.98) with propensity-matched MVA. Correlates of worse survival include older age as a continuous variable (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.02-1.02) and Black race (HR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.20-1.32) [all p < 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest such analysis performed to date, our study demonstrates a small but statistically significant association with improved survival for HER2-low tumors compared to HER2-negative tumors in MBC.

Comparative analysis of breast cancer characteristics in young premenopausal and postmenopausal women in Ghana.

Breast cancer is increasingly common among young women in Ghana. BCa is heterogeneous with unique traits that impact causes, prognostic, and predictive outcomes of patients before and after menopause. However, limited evidence exists on differences between young premenopausal (YPM) and postmenopausal cases in Ghana. This study compared breast tumour characteristics between YPM women (under 35 years) and postmenopausal women. We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study involving 140 BCa-diagnosed women at the Breast Care Clinic of Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH), Kumasi from November 2019 to June 2021. Thirty-one (22.1%) of participants were YPM and 109 (77.9%) were postmenopausal. The median ages for YPM and postmenopausal were 32.0 (range: 25.0-35.0) and 57.0 (48.0-86.0) respectively. Invasive carcinoma was the most common histological type (97.1%). Left tumour location was the most frequent in both groups (51.6% for YPM and 51.8% for postmenopausal). Lumps detected were frequently in the outer upper quadrant in both groups (61.3% and 56.0%). The majority of the YPM women (80.7%) and postmenopausal women (87.0%) had stage III and IV diseases. Most YPM (64.5%) and postmenopausal women (64.4%) exhibited triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Both YPM 13 (56.6%) and postmenopausal participants 40 (56.3%) exhibited a predominantly partial response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy but YPM women (21.7%) experienced disease progression than the postmenopausal women (12.7%). The study highlights consistent tumour characteristics and advanced clinical stages at diagnosis in both groups with a higher prevalence of TNBC. TNBC and HER2+ subtypes respond better to Anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Establishing Breast Care Clinics in district and regional hospitals for early detection is crucial and further studies are warranted to understand the higher TNBC prevalence in black Africans and re-evaluate breast education programs to address the persistently late presentations.

Neoadjuvant trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) with response-directed definitive therapy in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer: a phase II study protocol (SHAMROCK study).

BACKGROUND: The current standard of care in the neoadjuvant setting for high-risk HER2-positive (HER2 +) breast cancer is to combine systemic chemotherapy with dual HER2 blockade, trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Targeted therapies have significantly improved outcomes for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. To improve treatment-associated toxicity, chemotherapy-sparing approaches are currently being investigated. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an HER2-directed antibody-drug-conjugate (ADC) with promising results in the metastatic setting for HER2-positive breast cancer. The SHAMROCK study investigates neoadjuvant T-DXd in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer, using pathological complete response (pCR) rate as the primary endpoint. METHODS: This is a phase II open-label, single arm, adaptive multi-centre trial of T-DXd in the neoadjuvant setting in stage 2-3 HER2-positive breast cancer. Eligible patients will receive 5.4 mg/kg of T-DXd intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles. A repeat biopsy will performed after 2 cycles for the RNA disruption index (RDI) score assessment. According to their likelihood of pCR, as determined by the RDI score, patients will either undergo 4 or 6 cycles of T-DXd prior to imaging. Patients with imaging complete response (iCR) after either 4 or 6 cycles will proceed to surgery. Patients who do not achieve iCR will either undergo further systemic therapy or proceed to surgery. DISCUSSION: The SHAMROCK study is a chemotherapy-sparing approach to curative intent treatment, investigating neoadjuvant T-DXd. We hypothesise that neoadjuvant T-DXd will have a high pCR rate and be associated low toxicity in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT Number: 2022-002485-32; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05710666; Cancer Trials Ireland study number: CTRIAL-IE 22-01.

Estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer has distinct characteristics and pathologic complete response rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The status of hormone receptors (HR) is an independent factor affecting survival and chemotherapy sensitivity in breast cancer (BC) patients, with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) having the most significant effects. The ER-/PR + phenotype has been controversial in BC, and experts will face many challenges in determining treatment strategies. Herein, we systematically analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics of the ER-/PR + phenotype in BC patients and the response to chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included two cohorts. The first cohort counted the relationship between clinicopathologic data and survival outcomes for 72,666 female patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The second cohort analyzed the relationship between clinicopathological data and pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in 879 patients at the Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. The classification data were compared by the chi-square test and Fister's exact test of the Logistic regression model, and predictor variables with P < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate regression analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method evaluated breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) to investigate the relationship between different HR typing and survival and pCR. RESULTS: In the two cohorts, 704 (0.9%) and 11 (1.3%) patients had the ER-/PR + phenotype, respectively. The clinicopathologic features of patients with the ER-/PR + phenotype are more similar to those of the ER-/PR- phenotype. The ER-/PR + phenotype is more common in younger and premenopausal women, and most ER-/PR + phenotypes exhibit higher histological grades. Survival analysis showed that there were significant differences in OS and BCSS among patients with different HR states (P < 0.001). The survival results of patients with the ER + /PR + phenotype were the best. The prognosis of the ER-/PR + phenotype was similar to that of the ER-/PR- phenotype. On the other hand, we found that HR status was also an independent predictor of post-NAC pCR rate in BC patients. The ER + /PR- and ER-/PR- phenotypes were more sensitive to chemotherapy than the ER + /PR + phenotypes. CONCLUSION: HR status is the main factor affecting BC's survival outcome and pCR rate. Patients with the ER-/PR + phenotype possess more aggressive biological factors and can benefit significantly from chemotherapy. We need to pay more attention to this group and achieve individualized treatment, which will help us treat BC better and provide new targets and blueprints for our clinical treatment.

Characteristics, healthcare utilization, and outcomes of patients with HER2-low breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Treatment for HER2-low [defined as ImmunoHistoChemistry (IHC) 1 + or 2 + and negative/normal in Situ Hybridization (ISH)] breast cancer patients is rapidly evolving, yet we lack critical information about the HER2-low population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women aged 18 years or older diagnosed with breast cancer between 2010 and 2016 in North Carolina. Analyses were conducted for the overall cohort and a stage IV sub-cohort. We examined demographic and clinical characteristics, and characterized prevalence of HER2-low disease and healthcare utilization. We estimated adjusted rate ratios for the association between HER2 classifications and utilization outcomes, and hazard ratios for 3-year all cause mortality (stage IV only). RESULTS: The overall and stage IV cohorts included 12,965 and 635 patients, respectively. HER2-low patients represented more than half of both cohorts (59% overall, 53% stage IV). HER2-low patients were more likely than IHC 0 patients to have hormone receptor (HR)-positive disease. In the stage IV cohort, HER2-low patients were more likely to be Black (26% vs. 16% IHC 0, p = 0.0159). In both cohorts, rates of hospitalizations were slightly higher among HER2-low patients. There were no survival differences between HER2-low and IHC 0 among stage IV patients. CONCLUSION: New treatment options for HER2-low breast cancer may have potential for significant impact at the population level particularly for patients with stage IV disease. In light of racial differences between HER2-low and IHC 0 patients observed in our cohort, research- and practice-based efforts to ensure equitable adoption of new treatment guidelines for patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer will be essential.

Predictive markers for pathological complete response (pCR) after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with HER2-positive invasive breast cancer that is node-positive and/or larger than 3 cm are generally treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We aimed to identify predictive markers for pathological complete response (pCR) after NAC in HER2-positive breast carcinoma. METHODS: Hematoxylin/eosin-stained slides of 43 HER2-positive breast carcinoma biopsies were histopathologically reviewed. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on pre-NAC biopsies, comprising HER2, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Ki-67, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), mucin-4 (MUC4), p53 and p63. Dual-probe HER2 in situ hybridization (ISH) was performed to study the mean HER2 and CEP17 copy numbers. ISH and IHC data were retrospectively collected for a validation cohort, comprising 33 patients. RESULTS: Younger age at diagnosis, 3+ HER2 IHC scores, high mean HER2 copy numbers and high mean HER2/CEP17 ratios were significantly associated with an increased chance of achieving a pCR, and the latter two associations were confirmed in the validation cohort. No other immunohistochemical or histopathological markers were associated with pCR. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study of two community-based NAC-treated HER2-positive breast cancer patient cohorts identified high mean HER2 copy numbers as a strong predictor for pCR. Further studies on larger cohorts are required to determine a precise cut-point for this predictive marker.

Treatment Response, Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Clinical Outcomes in Inflammatory Breast Cancer-Treated with Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare (1%-5%), aggressive form of breast cancer, accounting for approximately 10% of breast cancer mortality. In the localized setting, standard of care is neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) ± anti-HER2 therapy, followed by surgery. Here we investigated associations between clinicopathologic variables, stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL), and pathologic complete response (pCR), and the prognostic value of pCR. We included 494 localized patients with IBC treated with NACT from October 1996 to October 2021 in eight European hospitals. Standard clinicopathologic variables were collected and central pathologic review was performed, including sTIL. Associations were assessed using Firth logistic regression models. Cox regressions were used to evaluate the role of pCR and residual cancer burden (RCB) on disease-free survival (DFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS). Distribution according to receptor status was as follows: 26.4% estrogen receptor negative (ER-)/HER2-; 22.0% ER-/HER2+; 37.4% ER+/HER2-, and 14.1% ER+/HER2+. Overall pCR rate was 26.3%, being highest in the HER2+ groups (45.9% for ER-/HER2+ and 42.9% for ER+/HER2+). sTILs were low (median: 5.3%), being highest in the ER-/HER2- group (median: 10%). High tumor grade, ER negativity, HER2 positivity, higher sTILs, and taxane-based NACT were significantly associated with pCR. pCR was associated with improved DFS, DRFS, and OS in multivariable analyses. RCB score in patients not achieving pCR was independently associated with survival. In conclusion, sTILs were low in IBC, but were predictive of pCR. Both pCR and RCB have an independent prognostic role in IBC treated with NACT. SIGNIFICANCE: IBC is a rare, but very aggressive type of breast cancer. The prognostic role of pCR after systemic therapy and the predictive value of sTILs for pCR are well established in the general breast cancer population; however, only limited information is available in IBC. We assembled the largest retrospective IBC series so far and demonstrated that sTIL is predictive of pCR. We emphasize that reaching pCR remains of utmost importance in IBC.

Neoadjuvant therapy in hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant therapy is commonly used in patients with locally advanced or inoperable breast cancer (BC). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) represents an established treatment modality able to downstage tumours, facilitate breast-conserving surgery, yet also achieve considerable pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in HER2-positive and triple-negative BC. For patients with HR+/HER2- BC, the choice between NACT and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is still based on clinical and pathological features and not guided by biomarkers of defined clinical utility, differently from the adjuvant setting where gene-expression signatures have been widely adopted to drive decision-making. In this review, we summarize the evidence supporting the choice of NACT vs NET in HR+/HER2- BC, discussing the issues surrounding clinical trial design and proper selection of patients for every treatment. It is time to question the binary paradigm of responder vs non-responders as well as the "one size fits all" approach in luminal BC, supporting the utilization of continuous endpoints and the adoption of tissue and plasma-based biomarkers at multiple timepoints. This will eventually unleash the full potential of neoadjuvant therapy which is to modulate patient treatment based on treatment sensitivity and surgical outcomes. We also reviewed the current landscape of neoadjuvant studies for HR+/HER2- BC, focusing on antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and immunotherapy combinations. Finally, we proposed a roadmap for future neoadjuvant approaches in HR+/HER2- BC, which should be based on a staggered biomarker-driven treatment selection aiming at impacting long-term relevant endpoints.

Correlation of HER2 Protein Level With mRNA Level Quantified by RNAscope in Breast Cancer.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat patients with metastatic HER2-positive and HER2-low breast cancer, and clinical trials are examining its efficacy against early-stage breast cancer. Current HER2 immunohistochemical (IHC) assays are suboptimal in evaluating HER2-low breast cancers and identifying which patients would benefit from T-DXd. HER2 expression in 526 breast cancer tissue microarray (TMA) cores was measured using the FDA-approved PATHWAY and HercepTest IHC assays, and the corresponding RNA levels were evaluated by RNAscope. HER2 protein levels by regression analysis using a quantitative immunofluorescence score against cell line arrays with known HER2 protein levels determined by mass spectrometry were available in 48 of the cores. RNAscope was also performed in 32 metastatic biopsies from 23 patients who were subsequently treated with T-DXd, and the results were correlated with response rate. HER2 RNA levels by RNAscope strongly correlated with HER2 protein levels (P < .0001) and with HER2 IHC H-scores from the PATHWAY and HercepTest assays (P < .0001). However, neither protein levels nor RNA levels significantly differed between cases scored 0, ultralow, and 1+ by PATHWAY and HercepTest. The RNA levels were significantly higher (P = .030) in responders (6.4 ± 8.2 dots/cell, n = 12) than those in nonresponders (2.6 ± 2.2, n = 20) to T-DXd. RNAscope is a simple assay that can be objectively quantified and is a promising alternative to current IHC assays in evaluating HER2 expression in breast cancers, especially HER2-low cases, and may identify patients who would benefit from T-DXd.

The Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Significance of HER2-Low in Early Breast Tumors Patients Prognostic Comparison of HER-Low and HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Stratified by Hormone Receptor Status.

Introduction: There has been increased interest in HER2-low breast tumors recently, as these tumors may have distinct clinical and molecular characteristics compared to HER2-negative and HER2-positive tumors. A new nomenclature has been proposed for HER2 1+ and HER2 2+ tumors that are confirmed negative according to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). These tumors are now referred to as HER2-low, and it is thought that they may represent a distinct subtype of breast cancer that warrants further investigation. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic impact of this particular subtype in a North-African context where HER2-low breast cancer is a relatively understudied subtype, particularly in non-Western populations. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 1955 breast tumors in Moroccan patients over 10 years, collected at the Pathology Department of Ibn Rochd University Hospital in Casablanca and at the pathology department of Hassan II University Hospital in Fes. We elaborated on their complete immunohistochemical profile based on the main breast cancer biomarkers: Ki-67, HER2, estrogen, and progesterone receptors. Their overall survival and disease free survival data were also retrieved from their respective records. Results: Out of 1955 BC patients, 49.3% were classified as HER2-low; of which 80.7% and 19.2% were hormone receptors positive and negative, respectively. The clinicopathologic features indicate that HER2-low subtype tumors behave much more like HER2-positive than HER2-negative tumors. The survival analysis showed that the HER2-low subtype-belonging patients present significantly the poorest prognosis in disease-free survival (p = 0.003) in comparison with HER2-negative ones. When considering the hormonal status, hormonal-dependent tumors show a significant difference according to HER2 subtypes in disease-free survival (p < 0.001). Yet no significant difference was shown among hormonal negative tumors. Moreover, patients with hormonal positive tumors and simultaneously belonging to the HER2-low subgroup present a significantly good prognosis in overall survival compared to the ones with hormonal negative tumors (p = 0.008). Conclusion: Our study has shown that the HER2-low phenotype is common among hormone-positive patients. The clinicopathological features and prognostic data indicate that the hormonal receptors effect and HER2 heterogeneity are crucial factors to consider. It is important to note that this particular subgroup is different from the HER2-negative one and should not be treated in the same way. Therefore, this study offers a new perspective in the management of HER2-low patients and can serve as a basis for future prospective analyses.

Third-line treatment patterns in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of real-world data in Canada.

There is an increasing demand for real-world data pertaining to the usage of cancer treatments, especially in settings where no standard treatment is specifically recommended. This study presents the first real-world analysis of third-line treatment patterns in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients in Canada. The purpose was to assess evolution of clinical practice and identify unmet needs in post-second-line therapy. Retrospective data from medical records of 66 patients who received third-line treatment before 31st October 2018, and data from 56 patients who received third-line treatment after this date, extracted from the Personalize My Treatment (PMT) cancer patient registry, were analyzed. In the first cohort, the study revealed heterogeneity in the third-line setting, with trastuzumab, lapatinib, and T-DM1 being the main treatment options. Even though data were collected before the wide availability of tucatinib, neratinib and trastuzumab deruxtecan in Canada, the PMT cohort revealed the emergence of new therapeutic combinations and a shift from lapatinib usage to T-DM1 choice was observed. These findings underscore the evolving nature of third-line treatment strategies in Canada, a facet that is intrinsically tied to the availability of new drugs. The absence of a consensus on post-second-line treatment highlights the pressing need for more efficient therapeutic alternatives beyond the currently available options. This study not only offers valuable insights into the present landscape of third-line treatment in Canada but validates the significance and effectiveness of the PMT registry as a tool for generating pan-Canadian real-world evidence in oncology and its capacity to provide information on evolution of therapeutic practices.

Evidence into practice: a national cohort study of NICE-recommended oncological drug therapy utilisation among women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in England.

BACKGROUND: Multiple drug treatments are approved for invasive breast cancer (IBC). We investigated uptake of NICE-recommended oncological drugs and variation by age, comorbidity burden and geographical region. METHODS: Women (aged 50+ years) diagnosed with IBC from 2014 to 2019, were identified from England Cancer Registry data and drug utilisation from Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy data. Interrupted time series analysis assessed national-level changes in drug use after publication of NICE recommendations. Regression models analysed variation in use. RESULTS: This national cohort included 168,449 women. Use of drugs recommended for first-line treatment varied, from 26.6% for CDK 4/6 inhibitors to 63.8% for HER2-targeting therapies. Utilisation of drugs with a NICE recommendation published between 2014 and 2019, increased among patients diagnosed around the time of publication, except in the case of pertuzumab for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) which was previously accessible via the Cancer Drugs Fund (though use of pertuzumab for MBC increased from 34.1% to 75.0% across the study period). Use of trastuzumab and neoadjuvant/adjuvant pertuzumab varied by geographical region. Use was low for ribociclib (2.2%), abemaciclib (2.3%) and for drugs recommended beyond the first-line setting. For all drugs, use after NICE recommendation varied by age at diagnosis and increased as stage increased. CONCLUSIONS: Use of NICE-recommended drugs for IBC in routine care is variable, with lowest use among women aged 70+ years. Improving access to effective treatments is an important step in improving outcomes.

A cost-consequence analysis of adding pertuzumab to the neoadjuvant combination therapy in HER2-positive high-risk early breast cancer in Italy.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials confirmed the beneficial effects of adding pertuzumab (P) to the combination of trastuzumab-chemotherapy (TC) in the (neo)adjuvant setting of high-risk HER2-positive early breast cancer (HER2+BC). We evaluated the clinical, economic and societal impact of adding pertuzumab to neoadjuvant TC combination (TPC) in Italy. METHODS: A cost-consequence analysis comparing TPC vs. TC was performed developing a cohort-based multi-state Markov model to estimate the clinical, societal and economic impact of the neoadjuvant therapy of TPC versus TC in HER2+BC at high-risk of recurrence. The model works on a cycle length of 1 month and 5-years-time horizon. Literature review-based data were used to populate the model. The following clinical and economic outcomes were estimated: cumulative incidence of loco-regional/distant recurrences, life of years and QALY and both direct and indirect costs (€). Finally, sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: TPC was associated with a 75,630 € saved of direct costs. Specifically, it was associated with an initial increase of treatment costs (+4.8%) followed by reduction of recurrence management cost (-20.4%). TPC was also associated with an indirect cost reduction of 1.40%, as well as decreased incidence of distant recurrence (-20.14%), days of work lost (-1.53%) and days lived with disability (-0.50%). Furthermore, TPC reported 10,47 QALY gained (+2.77%) compared to TC. The probability to achieve the pathological complete response (pCR) was the parameter that mostly affected the results in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggested that TPC combination could be a cost-saving option in patients with HER2+BC at high-risk of recurrence.

A SOX10+/AR- immunoprofile may identify a subset of low positive ER carcinomas with a wider range of ER expression.

BACKGROUND: Invasive breast carcinomas (IBC) that strongly express SOX10 are almost always negative for androgen receptor (AR). Furthermore, this SOX10+/AR- subset of IBC is nearly always estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor negative (ER-/PR-), being most commonly seen in triple negative breast carcinomas (TNBC), but also in a small subset of HER2+/ER-/PR- IBC. Following our previous work demonstrating the expression of SOX10 in a subset of IBC with "low positive" ER expression (i.e. 1-10 % ER+ staining based on CAP guidelines, here referred to as "ER-low"), we sought to investigate the expression of both SOX10 and AR in a larger cohort of ER-low tumors. As our previous work also revealed occasional SOX10 expression in IBC with >10 % ER+ staining, we also included tumors with any percentage of ER staining, as long as the staining intensity was weak (this subset is referred to as "ER-weak"). METHODS: We screened cases of HER2-/ER+ IBC diagnosed at our institution over a 10 year period, identified both ER-low and ER-weak tumors and stained both groups with SOX10 and AR. RESULTS: Strong SOX10 expression was seen in 12/25 (48 %) ER-low tumors and 13/24 (54 %) ER-weak tumors. ER staining in the SOX10+ subset of ER-weak tumors ranged from 15 %-80 % (median 25 %). As expected, AR was negative in all but 1 of the SOX10+ tumors in both groups. While case numbers in these groups were too small for a meaningful statistical analysis, we did note that all SOX10+/AR- tumors within both the ER-low and ER-weak groups were histologic grade 3. CONCLUSION: The presence of a SOX10+/AR- profile in a significant subset of ER-low tumors confirms the findings of our previous work and provides further support for the proposed functionally ER negative status of this group. Furthermore, the fact that the same SOX10+/AR- profile is seen in a roughly equal subset of ER-weak tumors suggests that a wider range of ER staining may be acceptable as "low positive" in SOX10+/AR- tumors, as long as the ER staining is of weak intensity. However, given the small number of cases in this single institution study, we emphasize the need for larger studies to establish the biological and clinical significance of this tumor subset.

[Treatment Strategy for HER2 Positive and HER2 Low Breast Cancer].

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)positive breast cancer has been regarded as a poor prognosis breast cancer, but since the development of trastuzumab and various anti-HER2 drugs, the prognosis has significantly improved. Also, combining anti-HER2 drugs with chemotherapy as preoperative treatment, shows high ratings of pathological complete response(pCR). In terms of breast cancer, pCR is a prognosis predictive factor. As a result, in perioperative treatment for HER2 positive breast cancer, residual disease-guided approach which means to select postoperative treatment according to the response to preoperative chemotherapy has become the main stream. Furthermore, trastuzumab deruxtecan, which had been covered by insurance only for HER2 positive metastatic or recurrent breast cancer, was newly reimbursed for breast cancer with low HER2 expression at the end of March 2023, and the future movement is attracting attention.

Safety profile of trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) with concurrent radiation therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In recent years, the treatment landscape for breast cancer has undergone significant advancements, with the introduction of several new anticancer agents. One such agent is trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), an antibody drug conjugate that has shown improved outcomes in both early and advanced breast cancer. However, there is currently a lack of comprehensive evidence regarding the safety profile of combining T-DM1 with radiation therapy (RT). In this study, we aim to provide a summary of the available data on the safety of combining RT with T-DM1 in both early and metastatic breast cancer settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis project is part of the consensus recommendations by the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) Guidelines Committee on integrating RT with targeted treatments for breast cancer. A thorough literature search was conducted using the PUBMED/MedLine, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify original studies focusing on the safety profile of combining T-DM1 with RT. RESULTS: After applying eligibility criteria, nine articles were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled data from these studies revealed a high incidence of grade 3 + radionecrosis (17%), while the rates of grade 3 + radiation-related pneumonitis (<1%) and skin toxicity (1%) were found to be very low. CONCLUSION: Although there is some concern regarding a slight increase in pneumonitis when combining T-DM1 with postoperative RT, the safety profile of this combination was deemed acceptable for locoregional treatment in non-metastatic breast cancer. However, caution is advised when irradiating intracranial sites concurrently with T-DM1. There is a pressing need for international consensus guidelines regarding the safety considerations of combining T-DM1 and RT for breast cancer.

Longitudinal multi-omics study of palbociclib resistance in HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6) therapy plus endocrine therapy (ET) is an effective treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (HR+/HER2- MBC); however, resistance is common and poorly understood. A comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic analysis of pretreatment and post-treatment tumors from patients receiving palbociclib plus ET was performed to delineate molecular mechanisms of drug resistance. METHODS: Tissue was collected from 89 patients with HR+/HER2- MBC, including those with recurrent and/or metastatic disease, receiving palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant at Samsung Medical Center and Seoul National University Hospital from 2017 to 2020. Tumor biopsy and blood samples obtained at pretreatment, on-treatment (6 weeks and/or 12 weeks), and post-progression underwent RNA sequencing and whole-exome sequencing. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the clinical and genomic variables associated with progression-free survival. RESULTS: Novel markers associated with poor prognosis, including genomic scar features caused by homologous repair deficiency (HRD), estrogen response signatures, and four prognostic clusters with distinct molecular features were identified. Tumors with TP53 mutations co-occurring with a unique HRD-high cluster responded poorly to palbociclib plus ET. Comparisons of paired pre- and post-treatment samples revealed that tumors became enriched in APOBEC mutation signatures, and many switched to aggressive molecular subtypes with estrogen-independent characteristics. We identified frequent genomic alterations upon disease progression in RB1, ESR1, PTEN, and KMT2C. CONCLUSIONS: We identified novel molecular features associated with poor prognosis and molecular mechanisms that could be targeted to overcome resistance to CKD4/6 plus ET. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03401359. The trial was posted on 18 January 2018 and registered prospectively.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients in the USA and Europe with HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer with disease progression on or after a trastuzumab-containing regimen (DESTINY-Gastric02): primary and updated analyses from a single-arm, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 15-20% of advanced gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancers overexpress HER2. In DESTINY-Gastric01, the HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan improved response and overall survival versus chemotherapy in patients from Japan and South Korea with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer whose disease progressed after two lines of previous therapy including trastuzumab. Here, we report primary and updated analyses of the single-arm, phase 2 DESTINY-Gastric02 trial, which aimed to examine trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients living in the USA and Europe. METHODS: DESTINY-Gastric02 is a single-arm, phase 2 study in adult patients from 24 study sites in the USA and Europe (Belgium, Spain, Italy, and the UK). Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, pathologically documented unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer, progressive disease on or after first-line therapy with a trastuzumab-containing regimen, with at least one measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (version 1.1), and centrally confirmed HER2-positive disease on a postprogression biopsy. Patients were given 6·4 mg/kg of trastuzumab deruxtecan intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal by patient, physician decision, or death. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate by independent central review. The primary endpoint and safety were assessed in the full analysis set (ie, participants who received at least one dose of study drug). Here, we report the primary analysis of this study, with a data cutoff of April 9, 2021, and an updated analysis, with a data cutoff of Nov 8, 2021. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04014075, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Nov 26, 2019, and Dec 2, 2020, 89 patients were screened and 79 were enrolled and subsequently treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan (median age 60·7 years [IQR 52·0-68·3], 57 [72%] of 79 were male, 22 [28%] were female, 69 [87%] were White, four [5%] were Asian, one [1%] was Black or African American, one [1%] was Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, one had missing race, and three [4%] were other races). At the primary analysis (median follow-up 5·9 months [IQR 4·6-8·6 months]), confirmed objective response was reported in 30 (38% [95% CI 27·3-49·6]) of 79 patients, including three (4%) complete responses and 27 (34%) partial responses, as assessed by independent central review. As of data cutoff for the updated analysis (median follow-up 10·2 months [IQR 5·6-12·9]), a confirmed objective response was reported in 33 (42% [95% CI 30·8-53·4]) of 79 patients, including four (5%) complete responses and 29 (37%) partial responses, as assessed by independent central review. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events were anaemia (11 [14%]), nausea (six [8%]), decreased neutrophil count (six [8%]), and decreased white blood cell count (five [6%]). Drug-related serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in ten patients (13%). Deaths determined to be associated with study treatment occurred in two patients (3%) and were due to interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis. INTERPRETATION: These clinically meaningful results support the use of trastuzumab deruxtecan as second-line therapy in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. FUNDING: Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca.

Detection of ERBB2 and CEN17 signals in fluorescent in situ hybridization and dual in situ hybridization for guiding breast cancer HER2 target therapy.

The overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a predictive biomarker in therapeutic effects for metastatic breast cancer. Accurate HER2 testing is critical for determining the most suitable treatment for patients. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and dual in situ hybridization (DISH) have been recognized as FDA-approved methods to determine HER2 overexpression. However, analysis of HER2 overexpression is challenging. Firstly, the boundaries of cells are often unclear and blurry, with large variations in cell shapes and signals, making it challenging to identify the precise areas of HER2-related cells. Secondly, the use of sparsely labeled data, where some unlabeled HER2-related cells are classified as background, can significantly confuse fully supervised AI learning and result in unsatisfactory model outcomes. In this study, we present a weakly supervised Cascade R-CNN (W-CRCNN) model to automatically detect HER2 overexpression in HER2 DISH and FISH images acquired from clinical breast cancer samples. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed W-CRCNN achieves excellent results in identification of HER2 amplification in three datasets, including two DISH datasets and a FISH dataset. For the FISH dataset, the proposed W-CRCNN achieves an accuracy of 0.970±0.022, precision of 0.974±0.028, recall of 0.917±0.065, F1-score of 0.943±0.042 and Jaccard Index of 0.899±0.073. For DISH datasets, the proposed W-CRCNN achieves an accuracy of 0.971±0.024, precision of 0.969±0.015, recall of 0.925±0.020, F1-score of 0.947±0.036 and Jaccard Index of 0.884±0.103 for dataset 1, and an accuracy of 0.978±0.011, precision of 0.975±0.011, recall of 0.918±0.038, F1-score of 0.946±0.030 and Jaccard Index of 0.884±0.052 for dataset 2, respectively. In comparison with the benchmark methods, the proposed W-CRCNN significantly outperforms all the benchmark approaches in identification of HER2 overexpression in FISH and DISH datasets (p<0.05). With the high degree of accuracy, precision and recall , the results show that the proposed method in DISH analysis for assessment of HER2 overexpression in breast cancer patients has significant potential to assist precision medicine.